The Raabe Review

Books, news and politics

Archive for January, 2010

The Great Minnesota Governor’s Race 2010 – Paul Thissen

Posted by draabe on 26 January, 2010

Perhaps not as familiar to voters as former Sen. Mark Dayton or Speaker of the House Margaret Anderson Kelliher, Rep. Paul Thissen (D) is creating a buzz among progressives – as well as republicans and independents – and with good reason. Representing Legislative District 63A since 2002, he has chaired the Health and Human Services Policy Committee and served on several other committees including the Finance Committee, Health and Human Services Finance Committee, Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement, Health Care Access Commission (Member) since 2007. In 2009 he was also assigned to the Environment Policy and Oversight Commission, and the Game and Fish Division.

His successful legislative record includes core work on covering 40,000 more kids with health insurance, reforming electronic records and billing (saving $70 million per year), allowing small communities to control how long-term care dollars are used, advocating renewable energy standards since 2003, encouraging entrepreneurship on social issues with Community Solutions Grants that will themselves become self-sustaining, reforming eminent domain laws to protect homeowners and small businesses, streamlining government reporting requirements and requiring cost-benefit analysis of privatization proposals, reforming campaign [rules] to reduce incentives for partisanship and speed up the resolution of complaints, preserving housing and other benefits for homeless veterans, writing and passing the Abigail Taylor Pool Safety Bill, and prohibiting sales of lead jewelry to children.

During a November 2009 debate, Thissen said that all the candidates were there for the same reason: they love Minnesota and think the state is headed in the wrong direction. The difference among them is how they plan to change that. He said the DFL has been playing “not to lose” for too long, and that it’s time to let go of the old ways of doing things and old grudges and political battles. He expressed a willingness to do things in a whole new way, which is exactly what many voters have been asking for since the 2008 election and beyond.

Both Thissen’s parents were Minnesota schoolteachers and his three children all attend public school. During the November debate, Thissen said that there are good things going on in our schools, and there are a lot of hard-working teachers in Minnesota. He said we need to have a discussion about this and then move on to the educational challenges we face. Rather than pitting charter schools against the public system, Thissen suggested looking at and taking what works in charter schools, and incorporating that into our public schools. He said we need to create exciting, engaging learning environments that fit the diverse needs of our students, and that we can solve the achievement gap if we have the political will.

With no shortage of political will, Thissen has a way of looking at the whole picture and “connecting the dots”. (Think how “no new [income] taxes” equated to unmanageably high increases in property taxes under Gov. Pawlenty.) He agreed that the state tax system needs reform, making the astute observation that we are taxing a 30-year-old “goods” economy, not today’s “service” economy. Thissen says we need a sustainable tax system, which means making it fair and changing the way we spend tax dollars so as not to have to constantly raise taxes.

Thissen has also connected the dots when it comes to our economy. One of today’s biggest financial challenges for small businesses and family farms (not to mention individuals) is the rising cost of health care. Thissen says we need to pay “smarter” for health care. His experience on the Health and Human Services Finance Committee and as Chair of the Health and Human Services Policy Committee since 2007 has taught him that “by redesigning health coverage, we can hold down the cost of health care for Minnesota’s families and businesses” and that “we must also fundamentally change the way we think about health care.” (Read more about his plan to reshape and improve health care here.)

In addition to acknowledging a moral imperative, Thissen recognizes how the lack of health coverage for Minnesota’s children and the upcoming difficulties in caring for Minnesota’s seniors affect our economy. In 2007 he authored the Children’s Health Care Security Act which provides a health care option for nearly 40,000 previously uninsured children in Minnesota. Regarding aging and seniors Thissen says, “The most cost-effective and many times the most desirable way to get needed care to older Minnesotans is with assistance from friends and family.” Putting words into action, he authored the Long-term Caregiver Protection Act, the goals of which are “to offer support to informal caregivers, delay the time when an older person is placed in a nursing facility and consequently, offer a significant savings to the state.”

Thissen’s understanding and expression of the interconnectedness of issues suggest a transformational style of leadership that might be just what Minnesota needs now. What excites voters about Paul Thissen is that his goals complete the vision Minnesotans have for their state – and he has already demonstrated a unique ability to create a path to achievement.

Posted in POLITICS, The Great Minnesota Governor's Race 2010 | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Minneapolis Widows Appeal to DFLers

Posted by draabe on 25 January, 2010

The Minneapolis Police Relief Association Political Fund has been sending out letters asking DFLers to “oppose the nomination of Minneapolis Mayor R. T. Rybak as the DFL candidate for Governor.” The letter is signed by five widows of Minneapolis firefighters and police officers who were killed in the line of duty. The reason these women are hoping Rybak will not be nominated is that:

“Several years ago R. T. Rybak and the City of Minneapolis brought a lawsuit saying that they no longer wanted to abide by the agreement to pay pensioners and widows. On January 1, 2010 this lawsuit resulted in pensions being reduced by 12%…On the same day our pension was cut, health care costs for some went up 16%. This has had a dramatic impact on our lives.”

What the letter doesn’t say is why the lawsuit was filed in the first place. The lawsuit claimed that pensions had been miscalculated according to the terms of the agreement cited by the widows, and property taxpayers in the City of Minneapolis had been overcharged in order to meet the pension payments. In October 2009 the Star Tribune reported:

“The dispute about how to calculate pensions for the closed funds is long-running. The city sued in 1995, and reached a settlement with the pension funds about how to calculate salary for purposes of figuring pensions. But the state auditor’s office flagged the two funds in 2004. It said that they were improperly calculating the salary on which pensions are figured, not following the settlement agreement with the city or legal requirements.”

Although Hennepin County District Judge Janet Poston “denied the city’s attempt to recoup its overpayments from pensioners,” [she] ordered the now-closed pension funds to reduce their claim on the city’s 2010 property tax levy finding that “past overcharges to the city amounted to $49.6 million for police pensions and $19.1 million for firefighters, dating to 2003. She found that future overpayments would have amounted to $62.4 million for police pensions and $24.4 million for fire pensions.” (Steve Brandt, Star Tribune, November 20, 2009)

An Appeal filed by the Minneapolis Police Relief Association, et al on November 30, 2009 was dismissed on January 20, 2010.

The widows’ letter states, “Elderly people in their 70s, 80s and 90s on fixed incomes now face terrible choices…” In today’s economy, this is indisputable and in a budget proposal dated February 2009, Rybak (who believes “People who worked hard for this city, and their families, deserve what they have been promised”) stated “The widow who pays property taxes should have the same protection as the widow who receives a pension check.” Judge Poston apparently agreed.

————————–

See: MPR NewsQ, Revised City Budget 2009 – Mayor R. T. Rybak, 2010 City of Minneapolis Budget and “Groups Queried in Anti-Rybak LetterStar Tribune, January 2, 2009)

Posted in POLITICS, The Great Minnesota Governor's Race 2010 | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

The Great Minnesota Governor’s Race 2010 – All Candidate Debate January 27, 2010

Posted by draabe on 20 January, 2010

On Wednesday, January 27, 2010 the Minnesota News Council and the League of Women Voters Minnesota, in partnership with the Minnesota Newspaper Association, are sponsoring an all-candidate debate among this year’s Minnesota’s gubernatorial hopefuls. Candidates from all major parties were invited to participate, and 20 candidates from the Democratic, Republican and Independence parties have confirmed their attendance at the debate which will be held at the Sheraton Bloomington Hotel beginning at 6:30 p.m. CST. Complete event details are available here. More information about participating candidates is linked below.

Democrats

State Rep./Speaker of the House Margaret Anderson Kelliher

State Sen. Tom Bakk

Former Sen. Mark Dayton

Ramsey County Attorney Susan Gaertner

Former State Sen. Steve Kelley

State Sen. John Marty

State Rep. Tom Rukavina

Minneapolis Mayor R.T Rybak

Ole Savior

State Rep. Paul Thissen

GOP / Republicans

Leslie Davis

State Rep. Tom Emmer

Former State Rep. Bill Haas

State Sen. David Hann

Phil Herwig

State Rep. Marty Seifert

Independence Party

Rob Hahn

Tom Horner

John Uldrich (ran for U.S. Senate as a Republican in 2006)

Rahn Workcuff

The well-timed debate should serve to help undecided voters make better informed choices on Tuesday, February 2, 2010 when the DFL, GOP, Independence and Green parties will be holding caucuses. For more details on caucusing (including locations), see the Minnesota Secretary of State website. Follow the Minnesota News Council Blog for updates. If you would like to submit questions for the candidates to answer at the debate, please email them to info@news-council.org. Other questions can be -mailed to Minnesota News Council Executive Director Sarah Bauer at sarah.bauer@news-council.org.

UPDATE: The debate will be live-streamed at TheUptake.

Posted in POLITICS, The Great Minnesota Governor's Race 2010 | Tagged: , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

The Great Minnesota Governor’s Race 2010 – Norm Coleman

Posted by draabe on 15 January, 2010

After dragging Minnesotans through the most expensive senatorial race in history in 2008, it seems unlikely that former Senator Norm Coleman would expect voters to rally around him again. Yet, former Republican Rep. Vin Weber says “he’s certainly thinking about it” and claims that Coleman is “getting a lot of people telling him he ought to do it.” (Politico.com)

Whether Coleman has support from “a lot of people” is debatable. In fact, MPR’s Polinaut reports “Former MNGOP Chair Ron Eibensteiner says in an op-ed that Norm Coleman should not run for governor and throws Coleman’s 2008 campaign team and strategy under the bus. The op-ed doesn’t say if Eibensteiner has endorsed another candidate.” But that doesn’t mean Coleman won’t run anyway.

On November 17, 2009, Coleman made an attempt to return to the national stage when he gave a speech at Harvard’s Kennedy School where he admitted, “Republicans have failed to welcome youth, women, Hispanics and gays” [to the party]. Claiming that America is now “a center-right nation,” he urged Republicans to “do a better job reaching out.”

Coleman also spoke at a GOP fundraising event Saturday, January 9 at the St. Cloud Country Club. Republican Rep. Marty Seifert, considered to be a Republican favorite for governor now that Pat Anderson has dropped from the race, was also there. (Anderson is now running for State Auditor – a race she lost to Rebecca Otto (D) in 2006.)

While Coleman claims he’s not made any decisions about entering the race, the signs are all there that he will run for governor or that he is, at least, banking this time in the spotlight for a future bid. He may heed Eibensteiner’s plea for him to stay out of this one and he may also have read the recent Rasmussen poll which matched Coleman against Mark Dayton (D) for governor. (Dayton, who clobbered Marty Seifert 41% to 25%,  beat Coleman 41% to 31%. ) However, his unrelenting – and, some say, embarrassing – performance during his last campaign revealed that his priorities don’t lie with the state of the State of Minnesota. So it won’t be too surprising if Coleman, once again, asks Minnesotans to fund another race for him.

Update: On the heels of the release of the aforementioned poll results, Coleman announced he is not participating in Minnesota’s 2010 gubernatorial race.  (TwinCities.com 19 January 2010)

Posted in Franken v. Coleman, POLITICS, The Great Minnesota Governor's Race 2010 | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

The Great Minnesota Governor’s Race 2010 – November 24 DFL Debate Final Comments

Posted by draabe on 9 January, 2010

On November 24, 2009 Minnesota’s DFL gubernatorial candidates met at the Hopkins Center for the Arts for a debate moderated by Tom Hauser of KSTP. The lineup included Ramsey County Attorney Susan Gaertner, former Sen. Mark Dayton, Ole Savior, State Sen. Tom Bakk, former State Rep. (and DFL Minority Leader) Matt Entenza, State Rep. / Speaker of the House Margaret Anderson Kelliher, former State Sen. Steve Kelley, State Sen. John Marty, State Rep. Tom Rukavina, Minneapolis Mayor R. T. Rybak and State Rep. Paul Thissen. In their final comments, candidates thanked the audience and hosts of the debate and tried to leave voters with a reason to remember them – and a reason to vote for them.

Ole Savior said there ought to be a limit on healthcare executive pay and spoke about the poor, disadvantanged people in our state who have been taken advantage of. He said we need to refinance the budget – not cut programs, concluding,  “Anything Pawlenty cut, I will restore.”

Susan Gaertner pointed out her position as an “outsider” who, as Ramsey County Attorney, has been fighting crime which she says is “a winning formula.”  She said she is a proven vote-winner and a go-getter, “I said I’d reduce gun violence, get kids back in school, increase child support enforcement – I got it done…I’ll bring progressive values and passion for the state and get job done.”

Mark Dayton recalled his teaching stint right out of college in lower east side New York City. At the time, he lived with a welfare family in New York City which experience has shaped his political values. He said these children were born into circumstances completely different from his own and seeing the injustice done to them through no choice and no fault of their own is profoundly wrong. Dayton said that progressive taxation is a fundamental value of the DFL party and that the wealthiest 10% of Minnesotans are not paying their fair share.

Tom Bakk said people are looking for easy answers but there has to be a debate about the problems Minnesota faces. He said the government has to be totally different from what it’s been like under Gov. Pawlenty. The new governor has to be a uniter, set the tone at the capitol, bring in business and labor, and have an honest debate. He said the candidate who can connect with people on the “jobs” message will be the next governor.

Matt Entenza drew upon his experience growing up in Worthington, Minnesota when, at the age of 15, he lost his father. His family had no health care and were facing homelessness, but lived in a state and a town that rallied around his family, a state where education was a priority. Entenza said, “It’s not like that now.” He said we opportunities to become an economic powerhouse and a leader who has a vision of where we can go. He believes we can pay ourselves for energy, that we can put money back into our state through clean energy – building wind turbines and using solar collectors.

Margaret Anderson Kelliher said she’d been personally thanked by a man who said he had a job because of her. Kelliher’s work building a coalition to override Gov. Pawlenty when he said no to needed investments brought road construction jobs to our state. During the past three years in the MN House of Representatives, she has helped ” put together a coalition to pass funding progressive taxation for education, renewable standards, the legacy amendment, and health care reform.” She said Minnesota needs a governor who understands them and who will be as hardworking as they are.

Steve Kelley said Minnesotans need a governor who will “pay attention to the long-term greatness of Minnesota to make sure our grandchildren prosper in this state.” He wants to create the same prosperity for working families that his grandparents enjoyed,  the kind of small business environment his parents enjoyed, and opportunities for all kids to graduate from post-secondary education. He said, “I know we can. One governor and five million heroes in the state will get it done.” In 1992, he was able to win his seat in the MN House [from the Republicans] and hold it. “With your help,” Kelley said, “that’s what we’ll do in the governor’s office in 2010.

John Marty said he wants to build a great future for Minnesota, where everyone has educational opportunities, health care, a clean environment and a safe community. He reiterated that he does not take PAC or lobbyist money. He believes in “health care for all, not insurance for some.” He said this race needs someone who can win and that he lost in 1994 (during the “Gingrich Contract for America” years) because he was ahead of his time, but his time is now. He has won seven times in his Republican-leaning district in the state senate race.

Tom Rukavina said, “Tough times call for innovative leadership” and that he is running a “refreshingly honest campaign.” Proud of his University of Minnesota-Duluth education, he returned to the Iron Range after graduating. He’s been a steel worker, owned his own business and has been a legislator for 12 years. Upon closing, he referred to himself as a cross between Paul Wellstone and Jesse Ventura.

R. T. Rybak spoke about the American Dream and how his mother had to run the family store after his father passed away, and was able to put herself through college. He said the community had a basic core value not shared by leaders in the capitol today. He said we need to rebuild common value and that “Minnesota needs leadership that’s about us, not him or her,” and that we can move the state forward together.

Paul Thissen said it’s been a privilege serving in the legislature and it wouldn’t have been possible without the help and support of his family. He  doesn’t like the consequences of Pawlenty’s decisions but sees how some Minnesotans respect his decisiveness and that “Democrats have been lacking that for too long in this state.” He said we have a moral imperative to cover every child in this state and that health care legislation has passed here because someone said we are more than a balanced budget. We need to “create a moral vision for this state and lead this state forward this way” and that “your involvement is what’s going to take back the governor’s office.”

Read more about the debate here.

Posted in POLITICS, The Great Minnesota Governor's Race 2010 | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »